Free Consultation

(253) 272-8666

Are you facing
criminal charges?

We will fight to protect you.

Request A Free Evaluation

Latest Posts

  1. Washington DUI Laws 2019

    Leave a Comment

    In Washington, along with the rest of the United States, it is illegal to drive a vehicle while under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Driving under the influence is very dangerous, putting the lives of the driver, pedestrians, and other drivers on the road at risk. As a result, the state of Washington imposes some serious administrative and criminal penalties if a police officer catches you driving under the influence.

    What Counts as a DUI in Washington?

    When most people think about DUIs, they usually think of drinking and driving. While alcohol plays a major role in many DUI cases each year, you can also receive a DUI charge after using other substances such as illegal and prescription drugs. Washington law enforcement can charge you with a DUI if you are driving under any of the following conditions:

    • You are 21 years or older and have a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08% or higher.
    • You have THC in your blood, which is the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. Having a concentration of five nanograms or higher of THC per milliliter of blood in your system is grounds for DUI.
    • You have used drugs or alcohol to an extent that they impair your ability to drive.
    • You are under the age of 21 and have a BAC of .02% or higher.
    • You are operating a commercial vehicle and have a BAC of .04% or higher.

    DUI charges range in severity based on a few factors. The higher your BAC or THC concentration, the more severe your charge will be. In addition, if you get into an accident while impaired by alcohol and drugs and cause significant injury, property damage, or death, you will receive a higher charge. First offenders usually receive lower penalties than individuals facing their second, third, or subsequent DUI charge.

    DUI Penalties in Washington State

    When you receive a DUI charge in Washington, you can receive any mix of administrative penalties, fines, and jail time.

    • If you are convicted of a first offense DUI in Washington, you can face jail time from 24 hours to one year. The state may take away your license from 90 days to one year, and you will have to install an ignition interlock device on your vehicle. You may also have to pay a fine between $865.50 to $5,000.
    • Second-offense DUI charges carry potential jail time sentences between 30 days up to one year. The state will require an ignition interlock device and take your license away for two years up to 900 days. You may have to pay a fine between $1,120.50 to $5,000.
    • Third-offense DUI charges involve jail time between 90 days to one year. You could lose your license for three to four years and have to install an ignition interlock device on your vehicle. You could pay a fine between $1,970.50 to $5,000.

    When a police officer pulls you over for suspicion of driving under the influence, he or she will ask you to take a chemical test. Under Washington’s implied consent law, you could face penalties if you refuse to take this test. You can receive a license suspension between one and three years and additional fines.

    What to Do If You Are Arrested for DUI in Washington

    If a police officer pulls you over on suspicion of DUI, comply with him or her. Take the chemical and field sobriety tests as required – if you refuse, you could face additional penalties. As soon as possible, contact a Tacoma DUI attorney to assist you with the court and administrative processes.

    Navigating the aftermath of a DUI offense can be overwhelming, but an attorney who specializes in DUI defense can help explain your options. Your attorney can advise you on what steps to take following the arrest and help you prepare for your Department of Motor Vehicles hearing and court arraignment.

  2. Can the Police Enter Your Home Without a Warrant?

    Leave a Comment

    If you are under investigation for a crime, police officers may show up at your home looking for evidence. They may demand to enter your property, but when you ask them for a warrant, they do not produce one. In most situations, the police cannot enter your home unless they have a signed warrant from a judge – but there are some circumstances in which the police do not need a warrant to search you. If you feel your home has been unlawfully searched, contact a Tacoma criminal defense lawyer.

    Unreasonable Searches and Seizures Are Unconstitutional

    In the United States, our Constitution gives us a set of certain rights that others cannot take away, from freedom of speech and religion to our right to a fair trial. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution specifically protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement officers. We all have the right to feel secure in our “persons, houses, papers, and effects,” and unreasonable searches without a warrant violate this constitutional right.

    According to the Fourth Amendment, the police cannot enter your home without a warrant from a court of law. A judge must sign the warrant and the warrant must give a description of the items that the police are trying to seize, as well as a description of your residence or premises. If a police officer enters your home and obtains evidence without a warrant, that evidence is inadmissible in a court of law.

    In What Situations Can a Police Enter Your Home Without a Warrant?

    While the Constitution does broadly protect us from unreasonable searches and seizures, there are some specific circumstances in which the police can enter your home without a warrant. If the police search your home or seize any evidence under the following situations, they did not violate your Fourth Amendment rights.

    • Consent to search. In some circumstances, the police can enter your property if you or someone else who is in control of the residence gives them permission to do so. The police cannot coerce or trick you into giving consent to a search without a warrant. If you have a roommate or spouse or rent from a landlord, he or she can provide consent to the police as well. However, the police can only search common areas with permission from others, even if your spouse or consent. If the police coerce you, trick you, or search your private quarters without your consent, they are violating your constitutional rights.
    • Exigent circumstances. The police can search your property in some emergency situations. If the process of getting a valid search warrant would impact public safety or lead to a loss of evidence, the police can enter your home without a warrant.
    • The plain view doctrine. Sometimes, police officers have the right to be on your property, but do not have the warrant to search your private residence. They may be responding to an unrelated call or searching for something else. However, if a police officer sees clearly visible evidence or contraband while searching your property, he or she can seize that evidence without a warrant.
    • Search incident to arrest. If the police are arresting you at your home, they have the right to search your home to protect their safety during your arrest. They may look for weapons or accomplices during this time. The police may also search your home to prevent anyone from destroying any evidence.

    If the police enter your home without a warrant and the situation does not fit any of the circumstances above, you may be the victim of an unconstitutional search and seizure. Any evidence they collect would be inadmissible in court.

    The police cannot force or coerce you to enter your home without a warrant or a valid reason. If you believe that the police violated your constitutional rights or you are unsure whether you fit one of the situations above, contact an attorney as soon as possible.

  3. What are Embezzlement Schemes?

    Leave a Comment

    Embezzlement is a costly form of theft that can result in millions of dollars’ worth of damage. Some perpetrators remove a large lump sum of money once from their employer, while others play the long game. In these scenarios, the guilty party removes money in small sums over time – sometimes over the course of a decade.

    Though we might think of embezzling as only dealing with money, it can actually occur in several different ways depending on what assets the perpetrator can get their hands on. In any case, embezzlement increases their net worth while decreasing that of the company/individual they steal from.

    Methods of Embezzlement

    Embezzlers must somehow come in contact with valuable property. The resources that an embezzler has at their disposal typically dictates the method they use to steal.

    Line employees and supervisors often take part in cash embezzlement. This can be done in several ways:

    • Pocketing cash from a transaction
    • Taking cash from other workers’ and/or customers property (ex. purses and backpacks)
    • Stealing change from customers
    • Refunding stolen items and then keeping the cash
    • Stealing cash from a coworker’s work area

    Negotiable document embezzlement can be committed by any level of employee that has access to important documents or can forge important documents. Embezzlers manipulate these documents, reproduce forgeries, and glean important account-related information from certain documents.

    • Money orders
    • Property documents
    • Travelers checks
    • Company checks
    • Refund authorizations

    Account credit schemes often involve creating fake identities and manipulating account information. Account credit embezzlement can take several forms.

    • Manipulating inactive bank accounts, usually owned by senior citizens and foreign account owners
    • Unauthorized bank account transfers
    • Creating fake employees and stealing their payrolls
    • Establishing loans and credit accounts for fake borrowers

    Embezzlers can also steal delivered or received items if they have access to these items within their line of work. This can occur when an employee does one of several different actions.

    • Places items in a dumpster to retrieve after workplace operation
    • Misusing employee benefits for friends and family
    • Stealing raw materials and scrap items after manufacturing processes
    • Manipulating stocks and bonds
    • Manipulating trust funds
    • Stealing equipment and supplies

    Wire transfer is a form of embezzlement that a perpetrator carries out by:

    • Manipulating their employer’s bank accounts and/or bank instructions.
    • Manipulating transfer instructions coming from an external entity.
    • Fabricating customer accounts and/or transfer information.

    Computer embezzlement comes with a myriad of related concepts that illustrate different computer-related embezzlement schemes. These represent the most common schemes that embezzlers use to manipulate accounts are:

    • “Skimming” (or removing small amounts of money) customer accounts. Utilizing “trap door” or “salami” techniques (many small transactions) to skim money, transferring this money to an alternative account.
    • Manipulating the company’s programming, or “data diddling.”
    • Inserting additional commands into the company’s programming, or “trojan horsing,” to make the program run extra unauthorized commands on top of its normal processing.
    • Inserting “logic bombs” commands, or commands that assign specific programming functions to occur at different intervals, like erasing illicit data.

    Famous Embezzlement Cases

    Two famous embezzlement cases have made headlines for their grandiosity, amounting to millions of embezzled dollars.

    The Enron scandal involves this energy giant’s CEO embezzling $11 million through accounting fraud. Operating without government watch due to its deregulation, the CEO of Enron (and its executives) approved the falsification of earnings reports. Moreover, the company staged a fake energy crisis and stole from their employees’ retirement funds. This was shocking to the public because Enron had significant ties to the White House at the time. Once the court ruled the company as guilty, they went bankrupt and CEO Jeff Skilling went to jail.

    Stanford Financial Group of Companies ran one of the most extensive Ponzi schemes in American history. The chairman of the company initiated a 20-year embezzlement scheme that involved selling customers’ deposit certificates to fund his real estate business, his personal business ventures, and betting on cricket tournaments. The court sent Allen Stanford to jail after his illicit business transactions were discovered.

    Successful embezzling schemes are meticulous, sometimes taking years to discover. Business owners beware that even line workers could be guilty of embezzlement, making company security vital. If you believe you’ve been the victim of an embezzlement scheme, contact our Tacoma white collar crimes lawyers to discuss your case.

  4. Hello world!

    Leave a Comment

    Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!